From the press release:

Bisexuality, often stigmatized, typically has been lumped with homosexuality in previous public health research. But when Indiana University scientists recently focused on the health issues and behaviors specific to behaviorally bisexual men and women, they found tremendous variety, and that commonly used labels, such as heterosexual and homosexual, can sometimes do more harm than good…

…”Unlike the other women in the study, the mental, physical and sexual well-being of queer-identified women was not related to the gender of their recent sexual partners,” [Schick] said. “This suggests that, instead of encouraging women to adopt labels that are more descriptive of their behavior, we should be more flexible in the behavioral expectations that we attach to these labels.”

For a variety of reasons, men and women often identify openly or just to themselves with a label that is different from their sexual history. One such reason is biphobia, the stigma and discrimination that bisexual individuals experience from both heterosexual and homosexual individuals.

Brian Dodge, associate professor in the School of Health, Physical Education and Recreation and associate director of the Center for Sexual Health Promotion, found in his study on sexual health among bisexual men that factors associated with biphobia contributed to feelings of isolation and social stress reported by many of his study participants.

It is may be also true that bisexual men avoid labeling themselves this way openly because of the stigma of male homosexuality. For me, there is tension between how important my attraction to women is to my identity and how important it is that I not resist people labeling me (incorrectly) as “gay” out of fear of that stigma. While “gay” can just mean “someone who has sex with someone of the same gender”, it also has an implication of someone who does not want to have sex with people of another/opposed gender. And that does not describe me accurately, nor do implications of deep romantic attraction to men (it could happen, but historically, it just hasn’t).

This seems similar to how being mistaken for a woman is not an insult in itself, in the sense that being a woman is not intrinsically negative, but for someone like me who has strong dissonance with my body and its connection to marks of “womanhood”, that misreading is still painful. There’s an actor (I can’t remember who) that has had rumors about his sexuality circulate for years and, despite being straight, never addressed them, since he said there was no reason to correct a misperception that wasn’t an insult.

We’re never entirely understood by others, I think (nor, probably, ourselves!) and there are ways of being misunderstood which are more difficult to cope with than others.

Anyway, the upshot is that I’m glad to see bisexual people’s identities being taken seriously in psychological study.

sciencecenter:

New study is a further testament to the hardiness of the water bear
The water bear is the cockroach of microbes; they nearly always pull through when researchers throw them into Armageddon-like conditions. Now it seems that even their unborn young have unprecedented endurance.

The microscopic animals called water bears already have quite a number of accomplishments under their belts. In experiments, they’ve survived the vacuum of space, large doses of radiation, extreme heat, extreme cold, and extreme pressure, giving scientists cause to believe that the little guys could potentially live on other planets and weather long journeys across space…
But to pull this off, they’d have to reproduce. Scientists have now exposed water bear eggs to three of these stressors—extreme temperature, vacuum, and a dose of radiation so strong that exposure to even a fraction of it would kill a human in days. They found that provided the eggs are given a chance to dehydrate themselves and go dormant, surprising numbers that survive: more than 70% of eggs for the temperature test, and more than 50% for the radiation test, while vacuum-exposed eggs hatched at similar rates as control eggs.

(Image credit)

This world is so unfathomably strange.

sciencecenter:

New study is a further testament to the hardiness of the water bear

The water bear is the cockroach of microbes; they nearly always pull through when researchers throw them into Armageddon-like conditions. Now it seems that even their unborn young have unprecedented endurance.

The microscopic animals called water bears already have quite a number of accomplishments under their belts. In experiments, they’ve survived the vacuum of space, large doses of radiation, extreme heat, extreme cold, and extreme pressure, giving scientists cause to believe that the little guys could potentially live on other planets and weather long journeys across space…

But to pull this off, they’d have to reproduce. Scientists have now exposed water bear eggs to three of these stressors—extreme temperature, vacuum, and a dose of radiation so strong that exposure to even a fraction of it would kill a human in days. They found that provided the eggs are given a chance to dehydrate themselves and go dormant, surprising numbers that survive: more than 70% of eggs for the temperature test, and more than 50% for the radiation test, while vacuum-exposed eggs hatched at similar rates as control eggs.

(Image credit)

This world is so unfathomably strange.

sciencecenter:

Amazing animal origami by artist Brian Chan

Pictured are some of the coolest, including a grasshopper, helmet beetle, fiddler crab, and a kracken. Click through to see the rest.

"Life has been around on Earth for a bit over 3 billion years, maybe even 4 billion years. Physicists tell us that the Sun will eventually swell and turn into a red giant (it won’t explode in a supernova as it isn’t massive enough). But before it turns into that fat old sun in the sky and swallows up the Earth, it will have rendered life on Earth impossible by simply making the place too darn hot. That will happen in around 1 billion years. So if you reckon that the window of opportunity for life on Earth is around 4 or 5 billion years, that means life is around 75% or 80% of the way through our alloted span – on this planet at least. So, Life, looking back on things, what do you think the best bits were? What was your greatest achievement? And what do you hope to do in the years that remain? After all, you’re someway along the downhill slope now…"

Matthew Cobb (via sciencecenter)

I still have hope that in a few million years we’ll figure out how to travel to and populate other planets. Or maybe “hope” is the wrong word. “Fear”?

(Source: whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com, via sciencecenter)

Take-aways: implicit biases are hard to get rid of (mouse trajectories show this) but not impossible (selecting against racial stereotypes show this). While it is a sickening feeling to become aware of your implicit biases, it’s probably a good sign because it means once you’re aware of them, you may be able to act against them.

Personally, I think we’re generally ethically responsible for trying to seek out the biases we have, responsibly weigh evidence that we have a purported bias, and not to act upon them. I do not think there’s a lot of good in shaming people for initially having the many biases that our culture feeds us through subtle ways. There does come a point, though, where I think, given enough resources, we become responsible for continuing to have them. Where is that point? Fuck if I know, but it probably exists.

neuropsy:

I love the simplicity of this study.

Thirty-four subjects—almost all white or Asian—looked at digital faces. They had to decide with an instant mouse click whether the face was black or white. Each of the 16 different faces was morphed along a continuum from white to black. And each face was…

(Source: scientificamerican.com, via best-likes)